W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Links and notes for the ISSUE-50 session

From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 12:57:11 -0400
Message-ID: <4DEA63E7.3090801@arcanedomain.com>
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
CC: www-tag@w3.org
Jonathan: I've added your goals and suggested readings to the agenda at 
[1].  Please check them. Thank you.

Noah

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/06-agenda.html#persistence

On 6/3/2011 10:02 AM, Jonathan Rees wrote:
> Links for persistence session (obviously not required reading)
>
> - geo: URI scheme
>      http://geouri.org/about/
>      http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5870
> - ORCID
>      http://www.orcid.org/
> - Datacite
>      http://www.datacite.org/whatdowedo
> - DOI Foundation
>      http://www.doi.org/handbook_2000/governance.html
> - duri:
>      http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-masinter-dated-uri-08
> - WebCite
>      http://webcitation.org/
> - P2P DNS
>      http://p2pdns.baywords.com/2010/11/30/hello-world/#comments
> - Namecoin
>      https://github.com/vinced/namecoin/blob/master/FAQ.md
> - W3C URI persistence policy
>      http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Persistence.html
> - Vocabulary Hosting: A Modest Proposal
>      http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/homepage/papers
>
> Discussion topics for session
>
> - Goal: links that are both actionable and "persistent" (trustworthy)
> - Use cases: (1) permanent record (text), (2) archival linked data
> - TAG can't take initiative but can inform and advise
> - The issue is trust, not technique.  DOIs are trusted by the affected
>      communities.
> - How vulnerable are DOIs?
> - How vulnerable are W3C URIs?  Thought experiment: Should W3C buy
>      some DOIs?
> - What sort of miracle might bring about actionable
>    trusted-to-be-persistent URIs?  Is this a thought experiment or real prospect?
>
> Jonathan
>
>
Received on Saturday, 4 June 2011 16:57:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:35 GMT