- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:55:42 +0000
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> writes:
> Henry,
>
> The words "this specification" in the sentence:
>
> To ensure that such fragment identifiers
> can be interpreted correctly, media type registrations for markup
> languages that incorporate RDFa should directly or indirectly
> reference this specification.
>
> was intended to refer to RDFa Core, not RDF Concepts (otherwise it would have said "that specification" ;)
>
> So if it said:
>
> To ensure that such fragment identifiers
> can be interpreted correctly, media type registrations for markup
> languages that incorporate RDFa should directly or indirectly
> reference this specification (RDFa Core).
>
> would that make it work?
Yes, thanks.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 12:58:52 UTC