W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2011

Re: ACTION-509

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:55:42 +0000
To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Cc: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Message-ID: <f5bfwgm6lkh.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> writes:

> Henry,
>
> The words "this specification" in the sentence:
>
>   To ensure that such fragment identifiers
>   can be interpreted correctly, media type registrations for markup 
>   languages that incorporate RDFa should directly or indirectly
>   reference this specification.
>
> was intended to refer to RDFa Core, not RDF Concepts (otherwise it would have said "that specification" ;)
>
> So if it said:
>
>   To ensure that such fragment identifiers
>   can be interpreted correctly, media type registrations for markup 
>   languages that incorporate RDFa should directly or indirectly
>   reference this specification (RDFa Core).
>  
> would that make it work?

Yes, thanks.

ht
-- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 12:58:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:44 GMT