W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2010

RE: ACTION-388 Take a look at LMM's doctype/versioning proposal

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:03:44 -0600
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Cc: "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1266447824.7402.114.camel@pav.lan>
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 10:13 -0800, Larry Masinter wrote:
[...]
> However, given current circumstances: I'd like someone else who
> cares about "polyglot" documents to take up this "change proposal".

I care about polyglot documents, but (to repeat*) I only care
about the intersection between HTML 5 and well-formed XML;
I don't care about DTD-valid XML.

I'm happy to let DOCTYPEs die; I regret adding them to HTML in the
1st place.

There was something in the HTML 5 spec that suggested
HTML 5 documents that happen to be XML-well-formed were
somehow not allowed, but that was acknowledged as a bug (#8154)
and got fixed. So I'm content.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8154

* http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/02/04-tagmem-minutes.html#item04


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 23:03:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:19 GMT