W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2009

Re: web architecture and safe content

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:18:06 -0400
Message-ID: <760bcb2a0910121118v14dc4466vc59667ac29fd44d8@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
Cc: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>, www-tag@w3.org
I'm sorry, isn't this exactly what the POWDER architecture is for?
Have you looked at it?

This is a technical list and probably not the best place to talk about
regulation.

Jonathan

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have no doubt RDF is useful for the web. W3C is actually doing a
> great job in developing technologies, which helps the web and all of
> us.
>
> I am actually looking for a subscription based service from ISPs,
> where I should be able to opt for say:
> 1) The present web
> 2) Non adult web
> 3) Adult web
>
> I am not sure, if anybody else feels such a need. I also feel, it's
> challanging to separate web content on the basis of above criteria.
> Filtering binary images is challanging, I guess.
>
> I think, if we achive such a separation of content, and provide these
> kinds of subsriptions to users, web could truly become a media like a
> newspaper or television. At present, there seems to be no regulatory
> structure and enforcement of content on the web.
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 18:18:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:17 GMT