Re: web architecture and safe content

I'm sorry, isn't this exactly what the POWDER architecture is for?
Have you looked at it?

This is a technical list and probably not the best place to talk about
regulation.

Jonathan

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have no doubt RDF is useful for the web. W3C is actually doing a
> great job in developing technologies, which helps the web and all of
> us.
>
> I am actually looking for a subscription based service from ISPs,
> where I should be able to opt for say:
> 1) The present web
> 2) Non adult web
> 3) Adult web
>
> I am not sure, if anybody else feels such a need. I also feel, it's
> challanging to separate web content on the basis of above criteria.
> Filtering binary images is challanging, I guess.
>
> I think, if we achive such a separation of content, and provide these
> kinds of subsriptions to users, web could truly become a media like a
> newspaper or television. At present, there seems to be no regulatory
> structure and enforcement of content on the web.