W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Comment on XSD 1.1

From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 23:53:32 +1000
Message-ID: <4A140B5C.40606@allette.com.au>
To: www-tag@w3.org
CC: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Mukul Gandhi wrote:
> Hi Rick,
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> wrote:
>   
>> Mukul, are you really sure you want to defend XSD 1.n as being
>> "straightforward"?  Gosh, things are worse than I thought  ;-)
>>     
>
> I find XSD 1.1 as having similar complexity to XSD 1.0.
That is a rather diplomatic response!

For the interest of the TAG group:
    http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028/             
137.62 KB (140,924 bytes)
    http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-xmlschema11-1-20090430/           
285.19 KB (292,037 bytes)

Why is XSD 1.1 Part 1 twice the number of characters compared to XSD 
1.0?  Both use UTF-8. (It presumably cannot be mostly the change list of 
Annex G.)  Richer markup?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 13:54:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:13 GMT