RE: Draft of TAG Submission to W3C Workshop on Web of Services for Enterprise Computing

There should be a bit more discussion on other solutions than
soap-response.  This includes mapping RPC to URI and including mapping
Ref Params(Qnames) to URIs.  Some examples:
1. SOAP to URI mapping: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/ws-uri.html
2. Sam Ruby's WS-HTTP:
http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2004/10/21/WS-HTTP
3. WS-REST:
http://www.pacificspirit.com/blog/2005/03/01/wsrest_continued_do_we_need
_an_http_transfer_soap_binding_and_simplified_wsdl
4. Binding Qnames to URIs:
http://www.pacificspirit.com/blog/2004/04/29/binding_qnames_to_uris

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] 
> On Behalf Of noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 8:13 AM
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Draft of TAG Submission to W3C Workshop on Web of 
> Services for Enterprise Computing
> 
> The TAG resolved at it's F2F in early December that I would 
> apply to represent the TAG at the upcoming W3C Workshop on 
> Web of Services for Enterprise Computing.  On our telcon of 
> Dec. 19 we discussed [2] a draft outline that I'd prepared 
> for a position paper.  I was asked to go ahead and prepare 
> such a paper, with the suggestions that the ouline be adapted 
> to focus more specifically on use cases, to better label the 
> use cases, and especially to make clear that the TAG is 
> coming to the workshop as much to listen and learn as to 
> promote any particular technical position. 
> On the call of Jan. 2 I committed to circulate a draft of the 
> submission today, and a copy is attached.  Note that actual 
> submissions are due on 10 January, which is approximately 3 
> or 4 working days from now.
> 
> I invite review of this document from the community, but 
> especially from the TAG, because it is intended to capture 
> our position.  Please keep in mind that this is not a TAG 
> finding, and I don't think it's practical or indeed desirable 
> in the few days available to try to refine it to the level of 
> quality or consensus that we would associate with a finding.  
> My view is that success for this paper is:  if it reasonably 
> correctly sets out issues that will promote useful discussion 
> at the workshop, then it's fine.  I have reserved some time 
> to do editing in response to comments, but please don't ask 
> for major surgery unless you think it's truly important.  The 
> TAG does have a call next Tues, 9 Jan, and I suggest we use 
> that to finalize our decision to submit. 
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Noah
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/12/11-minutes#item08
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/12/19-minutes.html#item06
> [3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Dec/att-0038/E
> nterpriseWSTag.html
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2007 18:58:06 UTC