W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2006

RE: Agenda of 18 July 2006 TAG teleconference

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:24:52 -0700
Message-ID: <E16EB59B8AEDF445B644617E3C1B3C9C01EB008A@repbex01.amer.bea.com>
To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, <Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr>
Cc: <Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr>, <www-tag@w3.org>

This whole note is exceeeeeeeedingly ironic.  We have regularly had
problems getting the right version of the versioning finding from URI
datespace. I *WAS* thinking of trying to come up with a very funny
response somehow relating the version of the document and the uri to the
fact that the newer version removed more of the "xml-centric" nature,
but I couldn't quite connect the dots.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of
> noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 12:47 PM
> To: Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr
> Cc: Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr; www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Agenda of 18 July 2006 TAG teleconference
> 
> 
> I note that the agenda links the new draft on versioning as
> "http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning-20060710".  In Firefox, at
> least, that gets you the XML with no stylesheet.  The non dated
version at
> [1] does work, and at least for the moment does indeed resolve to the
July
> 10 draft.    Looks to me like this is a case where our draft finding
on
> versioning might benefit from adherence to the advice in Raman's draft
> finding on generic resources [2] (which, ahem, also does not seem to
have
> a stable link for the dated copy :-( ).
> 
> Noah
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/alternatives-discovery.html
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 17 July 2006 20:25:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:41 GMT