- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:33:52 +0200
- To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
* Jonathan Borden wrote: >When I tried to point http://www.rddl.org/ directly at RDDL2 I received an >onslaught of complaints from people who are using RDDL1 and strongly >objected to my swapping the document format out from under them (I saw the >complaints as entirely reasonable and gave RDDL2 a new URI i.e. >http://www.rddl.org/rddl2.html ) It seems http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rddl.org/ http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rddl.org/rddl2.html both documents are not standards-compliant. Could this be fixed please? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2005 21:34:03 UTC