W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2005

RE: Revisiting namespaceDocument-8

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:08:49 -0400
Message-Id: <200506282208.j5SM8nqT058066@ohcg.spinweb.net>
To: "'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
---
It seems

  http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rddl.org/
  http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rddl.org/rddl2.html

both documents are not standards-compliant. Could this be fixed please?
--
What standard doesn't it comply to? RDDL 1.0 was never intended to be HTML
4.0 of any flavor.

RDDL (1.0) validates against the specified <!DOCTYPE> decl (that can be
uncommented out) which is an XHTML Modularization. i.e.

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//XML-DEV//DTD XHTML RDDL 1.0//EN"
"http://www.rddl.org/rddl-xhtml.dtd">

The <!DOCTYPE decl was commented out because XHTML Modularization caused
whatever version of IE to hang at the time.

It validates using the Brown validator BTW.

Jonathan
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2005 22:08:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:36 GMT