W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2004

Re: "information resource"

From: Stuart Williams <skw@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:13:12 +0100
Message-ID: <41506128.7020107@hp.com>
To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
Cc: 'Jon Hanna' <jon@hackcraft.net>, 'Chris Lilley' <chris@w3.org>, 'Jacek Kopecky' <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>, www-tag@w3.org

So Len... that's a thumbs down on the colloquailism?

Or maybe you wanted to confuse... :-) and maybe in my case succeeded :-)


Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

>It can clarify that the colloquial meaning is matched 
>to the testable meaning in any case where the colloquialism 
>confuses a user of that colloquialism.
>It is the test that commits the meaning.
>From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
>Jon Hanna
>Can I ask, if the remaining use of "information resource" is deliberate
>or an omitted edit?
>I think the optional sentence is baggage, the colloquial term "on the
>web" covers a lot, probably too much, it could confuse more than it
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2004 17:13:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:43 UTC