If you are refering to the trailling use of "information resource" that Patrick pick up on [1], I have already indicated [2] that it was an editing mistake on my part. If it was another use, can you give more of the surrounding context. Thanks, Stuart -- [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Sep/0134.html (search for 'Oops') [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Sep/0135.html Jon Hanna wrote: >Can I ask, if the remaining use of "information resource" is deliberate >or an omitted edit? > >I think the optional sentence is baggage, the colloquial term "on the >web" covers a lot, probably too much, it could confuse more than it >helps. > > > >Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2004 17:09:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:54 GMT