W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2003

Re: Minimal RDDL [NamespaceDocument-8]

From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 07:46:00 -0500
Message-Id: <p04330100ba73e5a34013@[]>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>

The rddl:resource element could do couple of things html:a couldn't. 
First of all, it could contain itself. This is ruled out by the XHTML 
specification. Secondly, it could contain block-level elements like 
div and h1 and p, even entire sections. The a element only contains 
inline elements:

<!-- content is %Inline; except that anchors shouldn't be nested -->

<!ENTITY % a.content
    "(#PCDATA | %special; | %fontstyle; | %phrase; | %inline.forms; | 
<!ELEMENT a %a.content;>
   charset     %Charset;      #IMPLIED
   type        %ContentType;  #IMPLIED
   name        NMTOKEN        #IMPLIED
   href        %URI;          #IMPLIED
   hreflang    %LanguageCode; #IMPLIED
   rel         %LinkTypes;    #IMPLIED
   rev         %LinkTypes;    #IMPLIED
   shape       %Shape;        "rect"
   coords      %Coords;       #IMPLIED

I'm not sure how important this is, but it does mean this proposal is 
less flexible than RDDL1

| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
|           Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava             |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA  |
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
Received on Saturday, 15 February 2003 07:51:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:37 UTC