W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Comments on Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:23:40 -0700
To: "'Norman Walsh'" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00fa01c25a0d$c8370980$0100007f@beasys.com>

Chris Ferris was making this same point wrt referring to contents of WSDL
files and use of QNames earlier today.  Resolution of this in a web services
friendly way would be very nice.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
> Norman Walsh
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 6:48 AM
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Comments on Architectural Principles of the
> World Wide Web
>
>
>
> / "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org> was heard to say:
> | A QName is a perfectly good reference to something which is
> | identified by a URI.
>
> Absent a mapping from foo:bar to an absolute URI reference, we can't
> say what URI identifies foo:bar.
>
> Until rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 is resolved, I'm not sure I can agree
> wholeheartedly with the assertion that qnames are references to things
> identified by a URI. I fear that URIEquivalence-15 will have some
> bearing as well (though perhaps not).
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | 'tis expressly against the law of arms: 'tis
> XML Standards Architect | as arrant a piece of knavery, mark you now,
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | as can be offer't; in your conscience, now,
>                         | is it not?--Fluellen, Henry V
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2002 23:41:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:11 GMT