+1. It's always been my opinion, as a member of the XMLP/GETF and WSD, that this ought to be addressed by WSDL 1.2. Added as issue #61 [1]. BTW, it would help if WSDL issues were raised directly on www-ws-desc@w3.org. Jean-Jacques. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x61 Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > > I, and I think the TAG, agree with having a WSDL definition for a HTTP > > GET-in/SOAP out binding that is orthogonal to the SOAP POST binding. > > Could this be added to the WSDL issues list, as it sounds like > > you are agreement as well. > > I'll be happy to, although that's already covered by the "support > SOAP 1.2" requirement. Anyway, its worth calling it out specifically.Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2002 04:36:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:51 GMT