W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: marker improvements

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 06:48:39 +1000
Message-ID: <4FC7D927.2030208@mcc.id.au>
To: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr>
CC: SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>
Cyril Concolato:
> Quick comment. The spec has the notion of 'markable' element. It
> lists some graphical elements but not others like ellipse, circle,
> rectangle. I think we have a resolution to define the exact stroking
> for those elements, so we could add them to the list of markable
> elements, no?

We do have that resolution (and I've introduced a term 
https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/paths.html#TermEquivalentPath but not yet 
defined the paths for the shapes) but I figured it was more for defining 
how stroke dashing works.
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2012 20:49:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:51 GMT