W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2010

Re: fonts-elem-05-t

From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:28:07 +0200
To: "Dirk Schulze" <vbs85@gmx.de>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vbxg45d2geuyw5@hit-nxdomain.opendns.com>
I agree, the test should be backported from 1.2T.

Cheers
/Erik

On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:50:07 +0200, Dirk Schulze <vbs85@gmx.de> wrote:

> I searched a little bit more in the mailing lists and found another
> comment as well as an entry in the issue tracking system:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0160.html
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2085
>
> I don't know if there are any results on this topic, but if so they
> should be backported to the SVG 1.1 test suite.
>
> Dirk
>
>> the test fonts-elem-05-t surprised me a bit. The example tries to show
>> the difference on various values for horiz-origin-x. But the expected
>> result looks like no horiz-origin-x is applied at all.
>>
>> I searched in the mailing list and found following comment to this test
>> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Mar/0080.html):
>>
>> "According to the spec the horiz-origin-x coordinate in
>> the glyph space should be aligned with the current text
>> position. If the x coordinate of the origin is increased,
>> I'd expect the glyphs move left in the rendered results as
>> the origin moves right in the glyph space. I'm assuming two
>> things: 1) The x coordinate increases to right and 2) the
>> horiz-origin-x is not added to the coordinates provided in
>> the glyps."
>>
>> Sadly no one replied to this comment, but I'd agree to this opinion.
>>
>> Any thoughts on this?
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Dirk
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:28:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:44 GMT