Quoting Ola Andersson <Ola.Andersson@ikivo.com>: > It would probably not be hard to support svg as an image type but we > prefer to use <image> only for still raster images and use <animation> > for animated vector graphics sine this is in line with SMIL and makes a > nice and clean separation between the two media types. I'd like to know if this would also apply to <html:img>, 'background-image', 'list-style-image', 'content', etc. besides <svg:image>. Makes no sense whatsoever. I agree that for these type of "images" certain features of SVG would have to be limited or even disabled but just forbidding SVG seems weird/wrong. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>Received on Friday, 17 March 2006 17:18:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:29:31 UTC