W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2006

Re: SVGT 1.2: <image> does not support SVG

From: Ola Andersson <Ola.Andersson@ikivo.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:35:24 +0100
Message-ID: <234EB4699C751A4A95DF4FD8D041BBFD05347B@SESTHSRV10.zoomon.local>
To: <www-svg@w3.org>, <eseidel@apple.com>

Hi Eric,
It would probably not be hard to support svg as an image type but we
prefer to use <image> only for still raster images and use <animation>
for animated vector graphics sine this is in line with SMIL and makes a
nice and clean separation between the two media types. 
See
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20050107/extended-media-object.html#
edef-ref
Thanks for the review
/The svg wg


----
From: Eric Seidel <eseidel@apple.com> 
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:10:44 -0600
Message-Id: <A0B92CB5-873A-4C5C-B3A6-EEE11BB45C9D@apple.com> 
To: www-svg@w3.org 

Greetings,

I found it peculiar that Section 5.7 <image> specifically disallows  
<image> tags from referencing whole external SVG files and instead  
suggests that content authors use <animation> instead for that  
purpose.  If implementors already have to support <animation>'s use  
of whole external SVG files, how can it be any harder for them to  
support whole SVG files as part of <image>?  I would encourage the  
working group to consider allowing <image> to reference entire  
external SVG documents.

Thanks,
Eric
Received on Friday, 17 March 2006 14:33:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:34 GMT