Re: [SVGMobile12] SVGT12-207: Conformance to uDOM

On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Ian Hickson wrote:
> 
> Please change the specification so that serious SVG implementations can 
> implement the W3C DOM instead, and still claim conformance.
> 
> If there are parts of the SVG DOM that are not an incompatible subset of 
> the W3C DOM, e.g. the parts of the SVG DOM such as SVGElement, please 
> define these in a separate appendix so that implementators can clearly 
> distinguish the parts that they must implement vs the parts that are 
> redundant with the W3C DOM. In this case, please make such a split 
> publically available for review before progressing to CR, as this would 
> be a significant change to the specification.

In addition, please make it clear that implementations that include full 
DOM Level 3 Core and DOM Level 2 Style implementations do not have to 
implement the "trait" APIs, since they are redundant with the 
aforementioned specs.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Monday, 2 January 2006 00:03:45 UTC