W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2006

Re: SVG12: getRGBColorTrait vs non-SVGRGBColor

From: Andrew Shellshear <Andrew.Shellshear@research.canon.com.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:01:42 +1000
Message-ID: <444E1DB6.8090406@research.canon.com.au>
To: www-svg@w3.org
CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, chris@w3.org, cam@mcc.id.au

Bjoern wrote:
>* Andrew Shellshear wrote:
>>We have changed the wording
>>
>>"actual trait value is not an SVGRGBColor, i.e. 'none' or a link to a 
>>paint server (e.g. to a gradient or a solid-color), this method must..."
>>to
>>
>>"actual trait value is not an SVGRGBColor, i.e. 'none' or a paint server 
>>(e.g. a gradient, system paint, or solid-color), this method must..."
>
>I agree with the concerns raised by Chris and Cameron, could
>the relevant sections be changed along the lines they suggest?

Section 11.14 now says:

Apart from System Paint, paint servers are referenced using an Local IRI 
reference on a 'fill' or 'stroke' property.

Please let us know shortly if that does not address your concern.

Andrew.
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 13:01:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:34 GMT