- From: Andrew Shellshear <Andrew.Shellshear@research.canon.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 16:35:34 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Hi Bjoern, > From http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/conform.html > > [...] > At times, this specification recommends good practice for authors and > user agents. These recommendations are not normative and conformance > with this specification does not depend on their realization. These > recommendations contain the expression "We recommend ...", "This > specification recommends ...", or some similar wording. > [...] > > In particular the "similar wording" bit makes it impossible to determine > for a statement like "It is recommended ..." whether this is meant to be > a requirement as defined in appendix D.2 or a informative suggestion. > Please change the draft such that is is unambiguous about informative > suggestions. We have removed the above quoted paragraph. The word "recommended" as used throughout the spec is to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. Please let us know within 2 weeks if this does not satisfy your last call comment.
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2005 05:00:42 UTC