RE: Resolving URIs in shadow trees

Cameron,

> I don't know if I would agree with that.  I'm sure there'd be 
> situations where you want a binding document to have some 
> gradients defined (for
> example) that are used by all the shadow trees for a 
> particular binding, and you want to use a URI reference that 
> contains only a fragment identifier.  It would be a bit messy 
> to have to include the gradient element in each generated shadow tree.

Definitely.

Perhaps we need some sort of 'static' declaration, like in C++, where we can
say that some content is available to all instances of a template, but it
actually only need occur once. It retains encapsulation, which is one of the
(many) benefits of XBL.

Regards,

Mark


Mark Birbeck
CEO
x-port.net Ltd.

e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net
t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/
b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/

Download our XForms processor from
http://www.formsPlayer.com/

Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2005 17:26:16 UTC