Cameron, > I don't know if I would agree with that. I'm sure there'd be > situations where you want a binding document to have some > gradients defined (for > example) that are used by all the shadow trees for a > particular binding, and you want to use a URI reference that > contains only a fragment identifier. It would be a bit messy > to have to include the gradient element in each generated shadow tree. Definitely. Perhaps we need some sort of 'static' declaration, like in C++, where we can say that some content is available to all instances of a template, but it actually only need occur once. It retains encapsulation, which is one of the (many) benefits of XBL. Regards, Mark Mark Birbeck CEO x-port.net Ltd. e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/ Download our XForms processor from http://www.formsPlayer.com/Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2005 17:26:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:31 GMT