Jim Ley wrote: > Is it really logical for the W3 to have 2 selector models which solve > identical problems in slightly different ways... maybe it's an issue not > for individual working groups to solve... No it's not, but the continued existence of both is historical. To be honest, the two have very different design goals: CSS is made to select very fast in dynamically rendered situations, and in order to get there it is vastly underfeatured and in a number of cases very ad hoc compared to XPath; XPath on its side is meant to be elegant and generic, and while it'll be slower it gives one much much more expressive power. So, I don't think it'll be possible to make everyone happy by chosing one, especially as both have strong active communities. We'll have to find a third approach. -- Robin BerjonReceived on Sunday, 5 September 2004 13:36:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:54:51 GMT