Ian Hickson wrote: > On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>I'm not 100% sure, but downgrading from XPath to CSS3 Selectors is >>probably easier. Except for cases like 'a:link', 'a:visited', but I'm >>not sure if those are necessary. > > Of course, there are good arguments for saying that the fact that > Selectors can do these dynamic things while XPath cannot is a good > argument for using Selectors in such a dynamic environment as XBL. :-) s/can do these dynamic things/has these dynamic things built-in whether you want them or not/ There's nothing keeping you from having the exact same in XPath. -- Robin BerjonReceived on Sunday, 5 September 2004 13:29:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:54:51 GMT