>>>> Anything that will be defined here as sXBL will certainly also >>>> be in the more general XBL 2.0? >>> >>> Yes - its to be a strict superset. >> >> If it will be a strict superset, don't the other groups have to >> agree on what you have created now? > > What other groups? I wouldn't know. I guess you should ask Chris: # Because a more general purpose one will take longer to make and # require input from more groups. The idea is to transition the RCC over # to sXBL so that the eventual XBL 2 is an upwards compatible superset # of sXBL. Since I quoted the above statement in my original mail, I thought it would be clear. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>Received on Sunday, 5 September 2004 14:27:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:54:51 GMT