W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Reconsider SVG 1.2

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 07:39:06 +0000 (GMT)
Message-Id: <200411180739.iAI7d6302349@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: www-svg@w3.org

> One of the reasons that his is such a hot button issue for me is because 
> I have felt strongly for some time that SVG is "almost" complete, but is 

It is a long way from complete, even compared with PDF, as it doesn't
include the semantic overlay, which may not be demanded by an unregulated
(commercial) market, but certainly should be demanded by the regulated
market that is created by accessibility legislation.  (The PDF term
for this overlay is "tagged PDF".)

At least one of the key parts of CSS, which is both most challenging
to SVG and independent of the CSS syntax, is to meet accessibility
requirements, namely user style sheets.
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2004 07:39:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:01 UTC