W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: SVG 1.2 Comment: Detailed last call comments (all chapters)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:09:39 +0000 (UTC)
To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411101209120.8631@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> 
> The two have very different syntaxes, and can be identified from the 
> property, you're overstating the case here, the IE implementation doesn't 
> not overlap the possible values of the SVG filter, IE's filter property all 
> take values such as:
> 
> filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Pixelate(MaxSquare=50, Duration=2, 
> Enabled=false)
> 
> There would be no problem identifying these compared to the SVG ones.

Parsing isn't the problem, it's the cascade and inheritance that's the 
problem.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 12:09:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:52 UTC