Hi Jim, On Friday, Sep 5, 2003, at 00:45 Australia/Canberra, Jim Ley wrote: > Since we have so little implementation experience, and no released > implementations that I know of, of instanceRoot on the USE element, > would it > not be a good idea to unify this with the shadowTree mechanism of RCC, > basically having USE have a shadowTree attribute the same as non SVG > namespaced elements. > > This would allow us to have a smaller number of methods to get between > shadow trees and the real trees so are code can be more generic. In the case of <use> it isn't really a shadow tree, it is a shared instance. If you go to the instance root and change something, then it will change for all references, whereas a shadow tree will only change that particular copy. So, I think it is a good idea to keep it under a different name to avoid confusion. DeanReceived on Tuesday, 9 September 2003 02:26:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 September 2006 18:11:23 GMT