- From: Randy Nonay <randy.nonay@net-linx.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 09:51:16 -0600
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Just my $0.02... Isn't XSD a W3C standard? Why is it being abandoned willy nilly by various workgroups in favor of rng - which is not a W3C standard?? Not having used RNG, with a quick look the one problem I see with RNG is that you can't have mandatory attributes. Not sure if this is a problem... Otherwise the XSD is already widely supported by SVG utilities, while RNG isn't... Randy Tobias Reif wrote: > Chris Lilley wrote: > > > Yes and just read it - its so simple and clear. > > yep :) > > eg > > <define name="Flow.model"> > <zeroOrMore> > <choice> > <text/> > <ref name="Heading.class"/> > <ref name="Block.class"/> > <ref name="List.class"/> > <ref name="Inline.class"/> > <ref name="Misc.class"/> > </choice> > </zeroOrMore> > </define> > > Having a nicely organized main normative schema written in such nice and > simple XML for SVG will be really great for people writing tools which > work with SVG. > > > There are various ways > > of writing RNG, one is the heavily nested, one big blob way, another > > is the 'dtd like' small definitions way; which i prefer and which this > > modularization uses. > > I also prefer this style. > > > TR> Perhaps Relax NG is a candidate format for the main SVG schema? > > > > Yes; because then we can form XHTML2+SVG profiles with ease. > > Sounds great! > > Tobi > > -- > http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2003 11:51:36 UTC