W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2003

Re: has the SVG 1.0 DTD been edited? (xmlns:xlink on element svg)

From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:45:04 +0100
Message-ID: <3E70A780.2040708@pinkjuice.com>
To: Dean Jackson <dean@w3.org>
CC: www-svg@w3.org

Dean


> They are the same file.


That's what I suspected :)

> /TR/SVG is /TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904
> 
> As Chris said, the undated versions will/may change,
> the dated versions will not change.


This I understand.

But Chris wrote

"
TR> I listed both
TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg10.dtd
TR> and
TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd
TR> and both seem to have been changed.
                      ^^^^^^^^^
No, just the undated one.
" (^s inserted)

Since
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd
had the erratum (IIRC) and now is fixed, it has been changed, although 
it has a date in it('s URL). No?

Anyways, I get the general idea, updated my templates and local DTD 
copy, so there is no real problem left.

Tobi


-- 
http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2003 10:46:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:24 GMT