W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2003

Re: has the SVG 1.0 DTD been edited? (xmlns:xlink on element svg)

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:40:24 +0100
Message-ID: <9211599500.20030313164024@w3.org>
To: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
CC: www-svg@w3.org

On Thursday, March 13, 2003, 4:20:28 PM, Tobias wrote:

TR> Chris Lilley wrote:


>> TR> I listed both
>> TR>   http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg10.dtd
>> TR> and
>> TR>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd
>> TR> and both seem to have been changed.
>> 
>> No, just the undated one.


TR> I get

TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg10.dtd
TR> <!ATTLIST svg
TR>    xmlns CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
TR>    xmlns:xlink CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"

TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd
TR> <!ATTLIST svg
TR>    xmlns CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
TR>    xmlns:xlink CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"

Skipping down the [deleted] parts of my email you will se it becomes
more specific about what undated means - in the filename.

svg10.dtd is an undated DTD. svg-yyyymmdd.dtd is a dated DTD.

Yes, there are dates in the paths as well - not my choice.


-- 
 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2003 10:40:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:24 GMT