W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2000

Re: [www-svg] <none>

From: Jon Ferraiolo <jferraio@Adobe.COM>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 17:13:15 -0800
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20001102171124.00d72340@mailsj.corp.adobe.com>
To: KAMTHAN pankaj <kamthan@cs.concordia.ca>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Thanks for pointing these things out. It looks like Appendix H needs some 
major updating. The SVG working group will coordinate with the WAI team on 
how to properly update the appendix.

Jon Ferraiolo
SVG Editor
Adobe Systems Incorporated

At 07:55 PM 11/2/00 -0500, KAMTHAN pankaj wrote:
>SVG 1.0 Specification (November 2, 2000)
>
>Appendix H: Accessibility Support
>
>H.1 says:
>
>"The W3C Note "Accessibility Features of SVG" [not yet published]
>explains in detail how the requirements of the three guidelines apply
>to SVG."
>
>H.2 says:
>
>"This section explains briefly how authors can create accessible SVG
>documents; it summarizes "Accessibility Features of SVG" [not yet
>published]."
>
>1. The note mentioned above been published; see
>http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG-access .
>
>2. Is Appendix H really needed now (that we have the aforementioned
>note published)? (I understand that it is not normative.)
>
>3. Why are the checkpoints and corresponding priority levels not mentioned
>in H.2? For example, "Provide text equivalents for graphics" would fall
>into Checkpoint 1.1 and [Priority 1], respectively.
>
>Pankaj Kamthan
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2000 20:13:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:19 GMT