- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 10:54:48 +1300
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>, Kip Gilbert <kgilbert@mozilla.com>
- Message-ID: <CAOp6jLYkuVQF9iYrHumG-uNmKmTqUoxOQN2qc1ugc-vrf_f2yw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:57:05 +0200, Robert O'Callahan < > robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: >> >> OK. So then "instant" would be the same as "smooth" when there are no snap >> >>> points. I guess that works. >>> >>> >> Good. >> >> >> But you still want to allow the author to ask for instant scrolling >>> without snap points for keyboard users and mouse users with a scroll >>> wheel? >>> >> >> >> *I* don't, because as I just mentioned I don't believe in the presented >> rationale for "scroll-behavior:instant". But others apparently do. >> > > OK. > > I think I'd like wider implementor interest before specifying instant as > proposed. But I can rename the current instant to normal so that it's > possible to add instant in the future. Does that work? Can we make it "auto | smooth"? Rob -- oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo owohooo osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o oioso oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo owohooo osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro ooofo otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:55:17 UTC