W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Selector Syntax Survey - subject indicator vs :has()

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:49:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDC3dgsbTj=Ez9+s6atD2v1VTibE0MQOM04DFj4uxBdpPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Feb 12, 2014 1:28 AM, "Daniel Glazman" <
daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/02/2014 21:52, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>
>> I've just posted the selector syntax survey I was charged with at the
>> last f2f:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1x0eXPBj1GN8Zau-7k9J_JGhoM6uGEqlJBkBBDFswT2w/viewform
>>
>> This will help us decide whether to use the subject indicator or the
>> :has() pseudoclass.  Please answer and share this poll!
>
>
> The poll was originally started with a choice between !foo > a and
> a:has(> foo) and then you changed it to ^foo > a and tthe :has() thing.
> Most people have voted and commented against ! but this is not relevant
> any more to ^... I suggest you reset your form and ask people to do
> the survey again.

We know exactly how many people voted before the change (130) and will keep
that in mind when evaluating the results.

(The results are sorted by time, so we know *which* votes were cast before
the change as well.)

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 16:49:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 12 February 2014 16:49:53 UTC