W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Resolutions regarding fragments

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:07:18 +0000
Message-ID: <52F10226.2040409@exyr.org>
To: robert@ocallahan.org, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On 04/02/2014 10:51, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> I do not understand this:
>
>        dbaron: 4 wrenches:  content box, padding box, border box, margin box
>        dbaron: could use * edge, * rectangle
>        SimonSapin: * area
>        fantasai: area already has an incompatible definition, and these
>     terms
>                  are used consistently all throughout our specs
>        RESOLVED: Don't use "element", "box", or "fragment" in new terms that
>                  aren't elements, boxes, or fragments.  Where possible,
>                  convert old terminology accordingly as well.
>
>
> How was dbaron's issue resolved?

I believe it wasn’t really.

I suggested "content area", "padding area", etc. But it didn’t get a lot 
of traction.

-- 
Simon Sapin
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 15:07:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:18 UTC