W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [css-shapes] inset() vs. inset-rectange()

From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:17:59 -0700
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE8488C8.14036%stearns@adobe.com>
On 10/16/13 6:05 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:
>> On 10/16/13 3:05 PM, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>>>I'm in favor of less typing, can we replace 'inset-rectangle' with
>>>'inset'?
>>>
>>>It's less "I'm making a rectangle" and more of an analog to
>>>margin/padding/
>>>border-image-outset, so I think it's clear enough on its own...
>>
>> I'm fine with that change. Tab - you are minuted as the person who
>> originally asked for an inset rectangle. Does inset() work for you?
>
>Yup, just fine.

Done. Thanks!

Alan
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 01:18:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 17 October 2013 01:18:31 UTC