W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [css-shapes] inset() vs. inset-rectange()

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:05:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCnZj+AQVvwBJf4qrU-N8aUW4qtqNiyDYCEdz1Jg0ZG1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:
> On 10/16/13 3:05 PM, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>>I'm in favor of less typing, can we replace 'inset-rectangle' with
>>'inset'?
>>
>>It's less "I'm making a rectangle" and more of an analog to
>>margin/padding/
>>border-image-outset, so I think it's clear enough on its own...
>
> I'm fine with that change. Tab - you are minuted as the person who
> originally asked for an inset rectangle. Does inset() work for you?

Yup, just fine.

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 01:06:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 17 October 2013 01:06:05 UTC