W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [css-shapes] Functional Notation

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:13:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAy3uT42OAbgEAByKarBco_Z-g-CprpknhfcxHL9pNXCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
> On Oct 3, 2013, at 2:46 AM, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>> On 10/02/2013 11:16 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>>> Furthermore we were in an agreement that <position> is a mistake
>>> that we can't undo because of existing implementations.
>>
>> I'm not sure who you think "we" is. Certainly there is no
>> such resolution amongst the WG as a whole.
>
> We came to this conclusion and resolved it for transforms in spring last year. As a WG!

I'm not going back to look it up right now, but I think that was in
the context of Transforms having 3d position.  Iirc, it may have even
been specifically about the fact that the 3-clause form of <position>
makes it impossible to extend into 3d naturally.

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 18:14:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 3 October 2013 18:14:07 UTC