W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [css-overflow-clipping][css-overflow] First Draft of Overflow Clipping now available!

From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 19:49:41 +1000
Message-ID: <524D3DB5.2090204@css-class.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 3/10/2013 5:53 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> Yesterday, I finished up the first draft of the overflow:clip spec:
> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-overflow-clipping/>
>
> It passed a quick review from Blink implementors, so I'd appreciate more review!
>
> ~TJ

How can a new value of clip be used for the property of overflow when 
clip is a property itself [1] (e.g. CSS2.1)?

Why is a new value of overflow being introduced into a new spec and not 
just (CSS3/CSS4) css-overflow [2]?

How can a new spec 'css-overflow-clipping' be introduced when the spec 
where is being dragged from, being 'css-overflow' is incomplete and unclear?

How can such differing behavior between Firefox/Chrome vs IE10/Opera be 
overlooked in this test case [3] or Firefox/IE10/Opera vs Chrome be 
overlooked in this test case [4] when this will impact on the behavior 
that is partly defined in 'css-overflow-clipping'?

Alan


1. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visufx.html
2. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-overflow/
3. 
<http://css-class.com/test/css/overflow/block-inside-auto-width-float-overflow.htm>
4. <http://css-class.com/test/css/visformatting/float-computed-used.htm>


-- 
Alan Gresley
http://css-3d.org/
http://css-class.com/
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 09:50:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 3 October 2013 09:50:12 UTC