W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2013

Re: The :min-width/:max-width pseudo-classes

From: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:33:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPJYB1h+Q+NabqLvQuyu43sSUDK9ZztObeBPwjqwbKHDcF6eug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Fran├žois REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 3/23/13 5:36 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/23/13 4:18 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>> I thought I'd explained the proposal sufficiently in my earlier email
>>>> that gave the steps as a numbered list.  ^_^
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/www-style/2013Mar/0422.**
>>> html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0422.html> ?
>>>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>
> That algorithm, as written, sure seems to preclude parallel layout of two
> viewport elements, in many cases, unless I'm just completely missing
> something.
>
>
Yeah that was what I was commenting on earlier.


> (It's also not entirely clear to me how well it plays with interruptible
> layout that does not always run to completion and various other things,
> honestly.)
>
>
Yeah, this needs more thought.

- E
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 04:34:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 29 March 2013 04:34:14 UTC