W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2013

Re: [css3-fonts] @font-face font-family names used in other @font-face rules

From: Adam Prescott <adam@aprescott.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 19:39:39 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+OJs9Tzp66kSHZPu9hHr3yU681-OBLKLJw39wSKRMPfvhzXBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Clearly I was too slow in my reply. :)

On 4 March 2013 19:24, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh!  In that case, you do indeed need control over the CSS.  For most
> (all?) of the font-hosting services, though, you can indeed do that -
> just copy their CSS file manually into your own (possibly adjusting
> links as required, if they're relative), and add a unicode-range
> descriptor.

This doesn't quite work without some tweaks, because Google Web Fonts
(and probably others) take care of browser inconsistencies for you.
But it's doable.

> That said, this does sound like a sufficient use-case to consider
> adding a third type of source into the 'src' descriptor, which
> explicitly refers to fonts exposed through @font-face.

Perhaps with something like font-family-src, even, as in the example I
just gave.

My guess is that it would require the use of @import over <link>, due
to parallelism issues?
Received on Monday, 4 March 2013 19:40:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:06 GMT