W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2013

Re: [css3-fonts] @font-face font-family names used in other @font-face rules

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:24:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAdzNvpctg3muyKvmQd-Owvr+v7U=osFVF3Jk7N1LDW4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Cc: Adam Prescott <adam@aprescott.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote:
> I think that Adam asked for the opposite: only use the ampersand from a font
> from Google Web Fonts.

Oh!  In that case, you do indeed need control over the CSS.  For most
(all?) of the font-hosting services, though, you can indeed do that -
just copy their CSS file manually into your own (possibly adjusting
links as required, if they're relative), and add a unicode-range

That said, this does sound like a sufficient use-case to consider
adding a third type of source into the 'src' descriptor, which
explicitly refers to fonts exposed through @font-face.

Received on Monday, 4 March 2013 19:25:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:09 UTC