- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 09:12:51 +0100
- To: Felipe Nascimento de Moura <felipenmoura@gmail.com>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, brice@websailors.fr
Le 29/06/2013 03:43, Felipe Nascimento de Moura a écrit : > Therefore, I think it would be highly adopted by developers if browsers > could support all > background-load-method: postponed; > background-image: url(mygreatestphoto.jpg) postponed; > background-image: image(postponed "foo.png"); I think we’d only want the last one. First, redundant features that do exactly the same thing should be avoided. But more importantly it’s not just background images: CSS as more and more places where images are used: list-style-image, border-image, content, … We don’t want to define additional properties or syntax for each of them. Adding stuff in image() has the advantage of being self-contained. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Saturday, 29 June 2013 08:13:09 UTC