W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [css3-syntax] Digest of remaining issues from recent discussions

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:30:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+eJvG7XpEBp7YSvsPstn0n7pA-RRHmhWbLH1C8EoTj8AQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote:

>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/www-style/2013Feb/0278.**html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0278.html>
>
> 1. Perhaps for team-legal rather than this WG? When a spec contains
> detailed algorithm in English, implementing it may look like "translating"
> it to a computer language, similar to translating the spec to another human
> language.
>
> Clarify that implementing is not a "derivative work" forbidden by the W3C
> Document License?
>

I think we should take no action on this (in the text) except to defer to
the W3C Team for advice. That is, we should not add text regarding
"derivative work" unless instructed to do so by the team. This is not a
issue specific to CSS3 Syntax.
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 14:31:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:06 GMT