W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Proposal: will-animate property

From: Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:58:16 -0500
Message-ID: <CANLC6v2N_3KNasqH=uXUjiy5g39z_jAkfdUBGz9Jywwy6Rq+CQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
Cc: Benoit Girard <bgirard@mozilla.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Matt Woodrow <matt@mozilla.com>, Cameron McCormack <cmccormack@mozilla.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Could we just require the entire list to be parsed, and require
>> implementations to ignore any string outside of the specified set? Then
>> when a new-property is added to the spec, older browsers and browsers that
>> don't care about new-property can treat "will-animate: new-property,
>> transform" as just "will-animate: transform".
>>
>
> Isn't this equivalent to what we've already proposed?
>

Oh, perhaps I've misunderstood? In your proposal, could individual
implementations choose arbitrary strings that they'll accept as
will-animate hints, and not just css properties + scroll?
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 22:58:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:17 UTC