W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Proposal: will-animate property

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 11:55:16 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLZCUK7Kc2bPPXnOffE9seqDAVABkz21cDVfQWuxdsaBAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org>
Cc: Benoit Girard <bgirard@mozilla.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Matt Woodrow <matt@mozilla.com>, Cameron McCormack <cmccormack@mozilla.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org> wrote:

> Could we just require the entire list to be parsed, and require
> implementations to ignore any string outside of the specified set? Then
> when a new-property is added to the spec, older browsers and browsers that
> don't care about new-property can treat "will-animate: new-property,
> transform" as just "will-animate: transform".

Isn't this equivalent to what we've already proposed?

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 22:55:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:17 UTC