W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2012

Re: [css3-lists] missing definition/reference of <image>

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:10:24 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDVXX=Tq4=qkak-KgdFyrK3LNYkfNdE5xJuATbqzXn0QA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org> wrote:
> CSS3 lists and counters defines the list-style-image property
> as <image> or none. However, the spec never defines what an <image> is
> nor references the CSS3 images spec.
> (I did check the Editors' draft and there's a paragraph under an
> anchor for <image> that's self-referencing, has a link to "invalid
> image" in CSS3 images but not to what a valid one may be, and no mention
> of CSS3 images in the normative references).

Yeah, sorry, it's meant to link over to either Values & Units or Image
Values, as they both provide a definition for <image>.  I'm lazy
sometimes about linking types present in V&U.

Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 17:11:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:05 UTC