W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2012

Re: [css3-background] border-radius: none

From: Tim Leverett <zzzzbov@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:13:16 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOiS3y71iSAbFz5VSQ6Lq=yfFFLSBcbjxUa6gpf8VOgQiZCN8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
>Would it make sense to extend the border-radius property (and its
longhands) to accept the 'none' keyword that would compute to the same as
'0' ?

I don't think this makes sense any more than it would be to add `none` as a
possible value for margin, padding, width, height, and any other property
that takes numeric values.
☺


On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> A designer colleague just wrote `border-radius: none` (to override a less
> specific declaration) and wasted some time trying to "make it work" before
> figuring out that they needed `border-radius: 0`.
>
> Would it make sense to extend the border-radius property (and its
> longhands) to accept the 'none' keyword that would compute to the same as
> '0' ?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Simon Sapin
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 13:14:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:02 GMT