- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:04:55 -0700
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote: >> Right now, section 4.4 "Implied Minimum Size of Flex Items" on the >> flexbox ED says: >> >> # Name: min-width, min-height >> [...] >> # auto >> # On a flex item, this keyword indicates >> # a minimum size of the min-content size. >> # It is intended that this will compute >> # to the ‘min-content’ keyword [...] >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#min-size-auto >> >> This doesn't make any distinction about the orientation of our flexbox. >> (horizontal vs. vertical) >> >> So right now, the spec is calling for all flexbox items to have *both* >> their min-width *and* their min-height default to "min-content". >> >> I'd thought we only wanted this magic for the main axis's min-size >> property, not for both min-size properties. Maybe I misunderstood though? > > Yes, the intention is to only have the magic apply in the main axis. > The cross-axis should be allowed to shrink to 0 unless the author has > set an explicit min size in that axis. > > I'll have to fix this. We've changed this. Is the new text in that section acceptable? ~TJ
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 00:05:50 UTC