On 6/28/12 4:20 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > We've made it a SHOULD now, so that it's legitimate to have things > work correctly if it's parseable into a double, but violate if it > would require custom parsing to capture the difference. Is that > sufficient? Yes, thanks! -BorisReceived on Thursday, 28 June 2012 20:40:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:55 GMT